I've a weird fascination for romance
stories and romantic comedies. I say weird because, as a guy, it
isn't considered socially acceptable. Guys are supposed to be
nonchalant, perpetually tough, and unwilling to show emotion. To do
otherwise would be to fail what is expected of us. I see the draw of
that image, just as I simultaneously reject it.
I like romances because they delve into
the psychology of people at their most vulnerable. We've all felt the
feelings before: lust, infatuation, insecurity, a yearning for more.
Through romantic stories we are able to view the complicated nature
of how we, as humans, embrace companionship or reject it. Is love
real or imagined? Is there such a thing as 'the One', or does life
hold many different possible partners, none of which are perfect or
ideal? Are people really meant to spend their life with just one
person? How does idyllic love measure up against the hard reality of
seeing your partner once again leave hair all over the soap in the
shower?
I was introduced to One Day
through the movie. The movie version, to me, was a horrific
superficial mess. I can honestly say that it was one of the most
depressing and annoying romantic dramas I've ever seen. It featured a
girl meeting a guy. The girl is obsessed with the guy; the guy is a
flippant, self-absorbed prick. I spent most of the movie with my jaw
hitting the floor, unable to understand what she saw in him. Two
thirds of the way through, I turned it off. I just couldn't see
anything there. I witnessed a selfish man fall to pieces, a doe-eyed
woman following him all the while. I hated it. It was shallow. I was
given no reason to care about these people, characters who seemed to
be going out of their way to implode without reason, longing after
each other without rationale.
Something was missing.
A Better Day
Then my girlfriend read it. Lo and
behold, the novel seemed to have redeeming value. She shook it cutely
in my face, said that I'd love it, said that I should read it. I was
resistant, though, for quite a while. I presented my reasons for
hating the characters. I explained why it was stupid for Emma to like
Dexter at all. I pointed out how, if the movie was that godawful, how
could the book do much better? But my girlfriend's responses threw me
for a loop. It seemed like there was more depth, more reason, behind
the actions of the characters than I had thought. They (*gasp*) had
motivations beyond the surface level.
Really, I should have caved earlier. It
seems ridiculously obvious. Of course the book would say more
about the characters and the events of the story than the movie ever
could. I just hated it so much. Perhaps it was Jim Sturgess. I don't
know what it is about that actor, but I always get to a point where I
really want to slap him, no matter what movie he's starring in.
Alternatively, it could have been the cynical nature of the plot and
what happens in it. No matter the reason, I tried it. And, while I
can't say I loved every minute of it, reading it was infinitely more
rewarding than I had expected it to be.
Premise
In brief, what makes One Day
unique is its choice of how to tell the story. We can already assume
that 'one day' these two, Emma and Dexter, will get together. But,
instead of proceeding exactly chronologically like we might expect,
David Nicholls only shows us where Emma and Dexter are at on the same
day every year. The first chapter starts on July 15th,
1988. The next chapter is July 15th, 1989. This continues
right up to the end of the novel. Thus every chapter skips an entire
year of their lives.
This is both a blessing and a curse. On
one hand, this choice allows us to see these two people change over a
great deal of time. It allows us to skip over a lot of unimportant
details. And it gives us a snapshot of important moments in their
lives, allowing us to see their victories, worries, and uncertainties
from their early twenties to their forties. On the other hand, there
are times where I felt like I had to make a leap of faith. Having a
full year happen from one chapter to the next occasionally made it
feel like I had missed too much. There are a few times where I was
completely floored by how differently one of the characters was
acting from one moment to the next. Granted, a lot can obviously
happen in a year but, sometimes, it felt like I had no warning that
something would occur.
Tortured Souls
But regardless of the premise, what
made One Day really engrossing was the characters and what
they go through. I feel like it is normal for authors to cultivate
characters who are more admirable than the average person, people who
we can aspire to become. But, in Dexter and Emma, David Nicholls
creates two people that are so flawed, so human, that you pity
them. It made me want to strike out and realize my dreams and desires
because, for the greater part of the book, these two characters are
completely unable to. Even at their happiest, they question whether
there should be something better. They think of childhood dreams or
the live-life-to-the-fullest philosophy of their college years, look
at their present, and find it wanting.
Essentially, this book serves to slam
the reader repeatedly with aggravatingly nasty and real existential
questions. What happens if you discover that your lifelong passion
isn't going to work out? What if the person you're with isn't the one
you want? What if you just aren't ready to be a mother or father?
What do you do if you continue disappointing your friends or family?
What if you are too tempted to do something that you shouldn't? What
if who you are is unrecognizable from who you think you should be?
The questions go on and on and never relent. What results is a
romantic story that is as poignant as it is realistic. It is subject
to the caprices and unpredictability of life. And we see the ups and
downs of their romance with others and each other, full of heightened
passion at one moment and then merely comfortable and content the
next.
Dexter and Emma
I'm trying to avoid spoilers, but I did
want to touch on what makes the characters of Dexter and Emma so
interesting to read about.
Dexter is a player. He's self-absorbed,
happy-go-lucky, and always at his most charming. Constantly
flirtatious, constantly pushing the limits, Dexter is the epitome of
the social butterfly. This is a guy who you look at and think, “He
must get all the ladies.” He does. He's got a zest for life that
everyone wants to be a part of. His sheer confidence is hard not to
admire.
However, he is also completely unable
to figure out what to do long term. He lives in the moment to such an
extent that he's unable to compensate for actual goals. Part of him
thinks he shouldn't have to, that such a laissez faire
attitude is so encouraged and embraced by society that he should be
able to live like that forever. Part of him resents his parents, who
believe that Dexter should be able to just decide on a career path
and make it happen. Another part of him fears that he just doesn't
have what it takes to be as successful in life like everyone else.
Emma, by contrast, models herself on
being a productive, intelligent, and active woman in life. She's
bookish and well-read. She makes constant references to classic
literature and defines herself on her creativity and smarts. She's
the woman you look at and think, “She has it all together.” She's
capable, funny, self-deprecating, witty, and loving. She has heart
and spirit, and the determination to use both, be it in her
friendships or in the public sphere.
However, she is also hard on herself to
the point of being a mess. Her self-image isn't there, and it's hard
for her to think of herself as beautiful. Similarly, though Emma has
the vigor for it, she doesn't believe that she is an interesting
person. Her standards for herself are so high that she dooms herself
to failure. She also lacks the confidence that she needs in order to
be more assertive, both professionally and personally. She's shy and,
when she fails to live up to where she wants to be, she attacks
herself with such fury that she comes off as morose.
Compatible?
One question that I found myself asking
continually throughout the novel was whether Emma and Dexter are good
for each other. On the surface level, it's like asking if the smart
creative quiet girl in the corner is a suitable match for the partyer
prom king popular guy. It's a simplification but, just looking at the
two, it's hard to pick out what they see in each other.
But, when you delve in further, there's
more to it. I found myself thinking of two puzzle pieces. As
mentioned just before, Dexter yearns for a solidity and
responsibility that he can never seem to reach. Emma craves
confidence, the freedom to recognize that she's beautiful, and a
desire to be able to let go and have fun. In a sense, they fit
together perfectly. Dexter is able to give Emma the release and wild
adventure that she wants, just as Emma is able to give Dexter the
focus and drive that he needs to succeed. Perhaps it is as simple as
that. Opposites attract and, by offering one something that the other
doesn't have, they complete each other.
Yet the novel doesn't leave it at that.
It is one of the strengths of the book that it offers such depth and
analysis of the characters and their relationship; we are never able
to walk away and definitively say that, “Yes! Of course they're
perfect together!” Though Dexter and Emma seem to complement each
other well, they also aggravate the shit out of each other. Dexter
lacks the drive to stay on top of current events or act responsibly,
which Emma can't stand. On the flip side, Dexter is continually
frustrated by Emma's inability to act with spontaneity or impulse. It
teases at the quintessential relationship question: is it better to
be with someone like you or somebody completely unique from you?
.
Conclusion
It's hard to say that I loved One
Day. A good deal of it is goddamn depressing; it hits on the
existential life questions with such bluntness and frequency that
it's hard not to lash out at it and turn on a Disney movie. I self
identify as someone who is passionately optimistic about life, and
this book is written by someone who just isn't on that level. Yet
that is not to say that it is all a downer. The chemistry and banter
between Emma and Dexter is often invigorating and exciting.
Similarly, though the ending is bittersweet, it does express hope for
the future. Finally, I naturally was very much absorbed in the
questions raised about the psychology of people in relationships and
how relationships work. The teasing, the touch and go, the
expectations and frustrations... This novel is extremely effective at
nailing just about every phase of infatuation, love, break-up, and
more. It is not the type of book that is about riding off together in
the sunset, but it still captures enough sweetness about how we love
each other for me to appreciate it for what it is. A story of two
people, how their lives become embroiled together, and what happens
when they dare to try their hand at loving each other. For that, it
is worth the read.
Haha, well your review definitely doesn't make me want to watch the movie! As for the book, I don't think I'll read it unless you somehow proclaim it to be "one of the best books ever!" I have a problem with reading downer novels.
ReplyDeleteAlthough, possibly reading part of it...hmm. We'll have to see.
I ALSO HATE THAT ACTOR!! He drives me freaking nuts. The only thing I ever sort of liked him in was Across the Universe.