What
I can definitively say without spoiling anything is that Catching
Fire, the second book of Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games
trilogy, is much better than the first. I quickly found myself in
rapt attention of what happened on the page where, by contrast, the
first book had me mildly entertained but nothing more. For those of
you considering reading the trilogy, I can now say that I do in fact
recommend it. It was exciting to discover that my decision to read
onward was worth my time in spades!
Now
I will explain why I enjoyed it, so one must be aware of spoilers
from this point onward.
.
Consequences
and Changes
One
of my problems with the first book was that it didn't go much into
the ramifications of what happened throughout. There were a number of
moments where the authority of the Capitol was subtly or overtly
challenged (Katniss' clothing, shooting at the judges, the silent
salute of the 12th district, the suicide pact). I was often
frustrated because the apparent reaction was for the author to sweep
it under the rug and not address the consequences of such
provocations. People merely ooh'ed and aah'ed Katniss'
flame/mockingjay motif. Her aggression was treated merely as a
spirited approach to the games. The salute was an intense moment not
mentioned or addressed again. And the suicide pact merely provoked a
quick get-out-of-jail-free reaction that preemptively ended the games
without much effort. I ended the first book lamenting how it
seemed like things just happened without any lasting impact,
lessening my interest in events as they played out.
But,
in Catching Fire, it becomes abundantly clear early on that an
enormous amount of activity was going on behind the scenes. Within
just a few chapters, we see that people are being killed for
dissenting, that full-blown riots are taking place in some of the
districts, and that Katniss is now on a VERY short leash for her
actions in the previous books. The tension is omnipresent and makes
for gripping reading as we see exactly how things pan out, feeling
very reminiscent of secret police crackdowns throughout history.
"Why
the change?" I asked myself. I wondered why we had to wait until
the second book to see anything truly momentous occurring. Then I
realized that the answer is simple. It is the viewpoint's fault. By
the author choosing a limited third person viewpoint focused only on
Katniss, we couldn't possibly know what ramifications her actions had
on anyone; she is shuttled about in a Capitol controlled environment
and then thrust into a scenario (the Games) where she can't know
anything of what is going on outside. As a writer myself, I thought
about it and wondered if the series would have been better improved
by giving a viewpoint to another character such as one of the
judges/overseers, like Haymitch. Then it could have had more depth to
it earlier in the story, instead of feeling initially shallow.
.
Hunger
Games: Round Deux
One
thing that I initially disliked about Catching Fire is that,
midway through, we discover that Katniss has to fight in the games.
Again. Now, maybe I'm not like most people, but I found the arena
fights of the series to be the weakest part. The devil is in the
details or, rather, the lack thereof. The author's sparse description
of setting and side characters makes it hard to feel for Katniss. And
the moments where she makes dumb decisions based on her terrible
instinct of other people are countless.
But,
despite my nitpicking, I thought that the games were handled much
better this time around. Having the competitors be winners of old
Games gave more weight and personality to each of them, making this
round feel more intense. Another thing I especially liked was giving
the dangers of the playing field a system of their own. In the first
book, the environmental hazards seemed random and without rhyme or
reason. By contrast, the concept of having the obstacles subject to
time zones and the island's layout being akin to the structure of a
clock was quite an interesting change.
.
Conclusion
All
in all, I enjoyed Catching Fire much more than its predecessor
and, because I actually LIKED the previous book, this is indeed an
indicator that this book was great! The epic jaw-dropping moments are
plentiful and the characters have much more depth to them. Though
Katniss is still kind of a dumbass (her actions at the end of this
book merely cement her idiot status for me), she actually has some
amount of compassion this time around, suggesting that she's actually
growing as a character. Haymitch becomes more awesome and Peeta, at
times, made me wish that he were the protagonist and not Katniss. And
that is a pretty amazing change considering how he was simply the
dead weight, starry-eyed, baker's boy first time around!
But
I did observe that, for me at least, the books tend to be at their
strongest when addressing the struggle between the Capitol and the
populace. The Hunger Games themselves, while occasionally exciting,
just seem like sideshows, especially when you know that the real
enemy is outside of them. Hopefully now that Katniss is a rebel, we
won't need to see the Games again. The sequel will tell.
.
Mockingjay
I
did, in fact, read the third book, Mockingjay, after this one.
However, I did not finish, having lost interest 3/4ths of the way
through the book and then looking up how it ended. The reason was not
because the book was horrible (in fact, it was initially engrossing
and another improvement to the series) but because I lost interest in
the characters, the events, and the villain. To speak plainly, Peeta
is lost, Gale becomes bloodthirsty, and Katniss becomes an annoyingly
emo waif who only gets worse as the book goes on. Considering how she
was always a bit daft and irritating, the expansion of her more
frustrating characteristics made me fed up with the book at large in
comparatively short order.
This
could have been rescued by an interesting villain, but President Snow
has always been one-dimensionally evil with no redeeming
characteristics. The overall power of the Capitol is overshadowed in
a surprisingly fast amount of time and, for no good reason, the
'heroes' decide to mount an assassination mission on the President
despite the complete lack of reason or need to do so. Beyond that, I
read that a lot of people get killed at the end, mostly as a result
of Katniss being ridiculous, leaving her an embittered old woman
finally married to Peeta. Just 'cause.
Thus
I suppose it came down to a lack of complexity, a lack of interest in
what was going on, and marginal attachment to the characters that did
it in for me. At least at the end. I'd recommend it up until right
after they finish the mountain/Peacekeeper stronghold mission. After
that it just felt like it went downhill from there.
Just read the first book. Pretty good, but it just made me want to re-watch Battle Royal.
ReplyDelete